Tamil Nadu Government Replaces Rupee Symbol, Sparking Political Controversy
Coimbatore: Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin speaks during the 'Mupperum Vizha' programme, organised to celebrate I.N.D.I.A. bloc's victory on all 39 seats in Tamil Nadu and one in Puducherry in the Lok Sabha polls, in Coimbatore, Saturday, June 15, 2024. (PTI Photo)(PTI06_15_2024_000312B)

The Tamil Nadu government’s decision to replace the official rupee (₹) symbol with a Tamil letter in its 2025-26 budget logo has triggered a political debate, with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) accusing the ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) of indulging in regional chauvinism. The move comes amid a broader dispute over the National Education Policy (NEP) and allegations of Hindi imposition in the southern state.

The Change in the Rupee Symbol

The new budget logo features ‘ru,’ the first letter of the Tamil word 'Rubaai' (which denotes Indian currency). Tamil Nadu Finance Minister Thangam Thennarasu is set to present the state budget, with the new logo symbolizing the DMK’s commitment to Tamil identity. The logo also carries the caption "everything for all," reflecting the government's inclusive governance model.

Political Reactions

Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman criticized the move, labeling it an act of “regional chauvinism” that could promote “secessionist sentiments.” She questioned why the DMK had not protested in 2010 when the rupee (₹) symbol was officially adopted under the Congress-led UPA government, where the DMK was an ally.

Adding to the debate, Sitharaman pointed out the irony that the rupee symbol was designed by D. Udaya Kumar, a Tamilian and son of former DMK MLA N. Dharmalingam. "By erasing it now, the DMK is not only rejecting a national symbol but also disregarding the creative contribution of a Tamil youth," she posted on social media.

Strong BJP Response

Other BJP leaders, including Union Minister Kiren Rijiju and Tamil Nadu BJP president K Annamalai, accused the DMK of playing divisive politics. Rijiju emphasized that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has done more than any previous leader to promote Tamil culture and language and urged the DMK not to “harm the nation by dividing people.”

BJP IT cell head Amit Malviya called the move an embarrassment for Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin, highlighting that the rupee (₹) symbol was introduced when the Congress was in power, and the DMK was governing Tamil Nadu.

DMK’s Justification

The DMK defended its decision, stating that it was promoting the Tamil language and culture. The party has been vocal against what it perceives as attempts by the Centre to impose Hindi through the NEP’s three-language formula. The Tamil Nadu government has reiterated its commitment to the two-language policy (Tamil and English), rejecting the Centre’s directive.

The Three-Language Formula and NEP

The NEP 2020 proposes that students learn three languages, at least two of which should be native to India. While Hindi is not explicitly mandated, the Tamil Nadu government sees it as an indirect push for the language. The DMK has framed its opposition as a fight against "Hindi colonialism," drawing parallels with British colonial rule.

Udaya Kumar's Response

D. Udaya Kumar, the IIT Guwahati professor who designed the rupee (₹) symbol, declined to be drawn into the controversy. He stated that it was a mere coincidence that his father was a DMK MLA, distancing himself from the political dispute.

Historical Significance of the Rupee Symbol

The Indian rupee symbol, adopted on July 15, 2010, is a fusion of the Devanagari "Ra" and the Roman capital "R." The two parallel horizontal stripes at the top represent the national flag and the "equal to" sign, symbolizing economic stability.

Conclusion

The debate over the rupee symbol replacement reflects the ongoing ideological clash between the Tamil Nadu government and the Centre over language, identity, and governance. While the DMK sees this as a step towards preserving Tamil heritage, the BJP and its allies view it as an unnecessary and divisive act. As political tensions rise, the controversy underscores the broader cultural and linguistic challenges in India's diverse federal structure.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *